<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Interference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.interferencejournal.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.interferencejournal.com</link>
	<description>A Journal of Audio Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:52:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Editorial: A Sonic Geography: Rethinking Auditory Spatial Practices</title>
		<link>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/a-sonic-geography/editorial-issue-2?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=editorial-issue-2</link>
		<comments>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/a-sonic-geography/editorial-issue-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 20:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rachel.odwyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issue 2: A Sonic Geography: Rethinking Auditory Spatial Practice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interferencejournal.com/?p=745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.interferencejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/graham_gussin_02-545x201.jpg" alt="Graham Gussin; I Love It, In Space there Are No Limits, I Love It; 2001 (Photo courtesy of the artist)." title="Graham Gussin; I Love It, In Space there Are No Limits, I Love It; 2001 (Photo courtesy of the artist)." width="545" height="201" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1022" />

The project for<em> A Sonic Geography </em>began with a recognition of  the vibrancy and increasing significance of various bodies of work on auditory space. Practices such as aural architecture, soundscaping, spatial music and sonic sculpture now find a non-specialist public and an institutional legitimacy that fosters future development. Moreover, theoretical research tracing sonic phenomena as cartography, site-specific signifier, or spatial strategy has acquired a new maturity in recent years. <em>Interference</em> wishes to progress this interaction between theoretical reflection from different domains of research and sustained practical experimentation as it generates new possibilities for auditory spatial awareness.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/a-sonic-geography/editorial-issue-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sound of Ruins: Sigur Rós’ Heima and the Post-Rock Elegy for Place</title>
		<link>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/a-sonic-geography/the-sound-of-ruins?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-sound-of-ruins</link>
		<comments>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/a-sonic-geography/the-sound-of-ruins#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 07:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>interference</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issue 2: A Sonic Geography: Rethinking Auditory Spatial Practice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interferencejournal.com/?p=718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amongst the ways in which it maps out the geographical imagination of place, music plays a unique role in the formation and reformation of spatial memories, connecting to and reviving alternative times and places latent within a particular environment. Post-rock epitomises this: understood as a kind of negative space, the genre acts as an elegy for and symbolic reconstruction of the spatial erasures of late capitalism. After outlining how post-rock’s accommodation of urban atmosphere into its sonic textures enables an ‘auditory drift’ that orients listeners to the city’s fragments, the article’s first case study considers how formative Canadian post-rock acts develop this concrete practice into the musical staging of urban ruin. Turning to Sigur Rós, the article challenges the assumption that this Icelandic quartet’s music simply evokes the untouched natural beauty of their homeland, through a critical reading of the 2007 tour documentary Heima. A closer reading of the band’s audiovisual practice reveals a counter-geography of Iceland, in which the country’s decaying industrial past is excavated and its more recent ecological failures are accounted for. As with post-rock more generally, this proposes a more complex relationship between music, place and memory than that offered by notions of reflection and nostalgia, which instead emerges as a melancholic mourning for spatial pasts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/a-sonic-geography/the-sound-of-ruins/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Any Place Whatever: Schizophonic Dislocation and the Sound of Space in General</title>
		<link>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/a-sonic-geography/any-place-whatever?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=any-place-whatever</link>
		<comments>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/a-sonic-geography/any-place-whatever#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 07:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>interference</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issue 2: A Sonic Geography: Rethinking Auditory Spatial Practice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interferencejournal.com/?p=716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Distinct from the tendency for field recording to be understood as a veridical act of documentation—faithfully recording the sonic specificities of  a given place—there exists a complementary tendency towards abstraction, emerging from the  ‘schizophonic’ dislocation implicated within phonographic practices. This tendency  emphasises the mutability of space in general rather than the identifiable specifics of place. This ‘lack’ of specificity is understood to expose an underlying productivity or generative capacity only accounted for in a more abstract notion of space. This paper focuses on the extent to which field recording practices are heard to occupy a point of tension between the identifiable fixity of the site-specific and the generative mutability of space in general, a point of tension that is audibly manifest in the work of artists such as Francisco López and Asher Thal-Nir.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/a-sonic-geography/any-place-whatever/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding Underwater: the Art and Science of Interpreting Whale Sounds.</title>
		<link>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/a-sonic-geography/understanding-underwater?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=understanding-underwater</link>
		<comments>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/a-sonic-geography/understanding-underwater#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 07:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>interference</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issue 2: A Sonic Geography: Rethinking Auditory Spatial Practice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interferencejournal.com/?p=722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This paper considers the importance of underwater sound. Making this inaudible environment audible to limited human hearing capabilities demands technical, imaginative and interpretative approaches to sound. Transdisciplinary approaches that treat sound as sonic evidence, suggests a shifted role for the composer and sonic ecologist. My analysis joins three seminal works on whale sound: Payne and McVay’s ‘Songs of Humpback Whales’, André and Kamminga’s ‘Rythmic Dimension in the Echolocation of Click Trains of Sperm Whales’ and Alvin Lucier’s Quasimodo: The Great Lover. Through a critical comparison of the scientists’ use of musical ideas of song and rhythm with the composer’s interest in processes of sound transmission over long distances, the necessity of exploring the contextual nature of sound in the environment becomes apparent. To this end I propose the physiological experience of sound in order to understand the sonic contexts of remote environments, exemplified by artworks from my Scorescapes project. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/a-sonic-geography/understanding-underwater/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sonic Geographies of Shifting Bodies</title>
		<link>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/a-sonic-geography/sonic-geographies-of-shifting-bodies?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sonic-geographies-of-shifting-bodies</link>
		<comments>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/a-sonic-geography/sonic-geographies-of-shifting-bodies#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 14:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sven.anderson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issue 2: A Sonic Geography: Rethinking Auditory Spatial Practice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interferencejournal.com/?p=1025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this article we present an experimental work focused on the sonic geographies of shifting bodies. The purpose of this engagement is to push the boundaries of empirical work in non-representational geography as well as to theorise the role of sound in the creation of social space.  Methodologically, we employ principles of Henri Lefebvre’s rhythmanalysis to an audio recording of moments in time at a student café. In our analysis, habit, rhythm, and movement form the amplifier through which we think through the ways in which sound constitutes place.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/a-sonic-geography/sonic-geographies-of-shifting-bodies/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sound Labyrinth Project: Catalyst For Creative Activity</title>
		<link>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/a-sonic-geography/the-sound-labyrinth-project?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-sound-labyrinth-project</link>
		<comments>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/a-sonic-geography/the-sound-labyrinth-project#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 07:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>interference</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issue 2: A Sonic Geography: Rethinking Auditory Spatial Practice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interferencejournal.com/?p=720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two large sound installations, developed by transdisciplinary sound art and research group Urban Sound Institute, created a meeting place for one year of artistic and pedagogic activity in a Swedish regional museum. The project involved a historic sound archive, a string quartet, a local radio station, pedagogic workshops, several schools, children's groups and musical education programs. The installations created a complexity of interior spaces, and acted as huge musical instruments to be 'played' by professional musicians, dancers and visitors. Through advanced computer programming and careful composition, modeling and distribution of sounds as words, narratives, music, space, bodily experiences and memory, the Sound Labyrinth allowed for great variations, durability over time, and different forms of interaction. The article describes the project, and discusses the exhibition as a platform for collective, multiple interaction; as an expanded musical-architectonic composition; and as a contribution to artistic research methodologies relevant for sound spaces within so-called making disciplines.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/a-sonic-geography/the-sound-labyrinth-project/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Editorial: An Ear Alone is Not a Being &#8211; Embodied Mediations in Audio Culture</title>
		<link>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/an-ear-alone-is-not-a-being/editorial-issue-1?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=editorial-issue-1</link>
		<comments>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/an-ear-alone-is-not-a-being/editorial-issue-1#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>interference</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issue 1: An Ear Alone is Not a Being - Embodied Mediations in Audio Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.120.246.226/~interfer/?p=296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.interferencejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/migone_front.jpg" alt="Christof Migone; Microhole; 2006 (Photo courtesy of the artist)." title="Christof Migone; Microhole; 2006 (Photo courtesy of the artist)." width="545" height="150" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-324" />

The title of the inaugural issue of Interference - <em>“An Ear Alone is Not a Being” : Embodied Mediation in Audio Culture</em> - acknowledges acoustic practices that involve not just the ear but a corporeal body that senses, resonates, transduces and responds to sound, and furthermore, seeks to emphasize the legacy of this embodied listening subject in the practices, media, and conceptual frameworks that make up audio cultures.  ‘Embodied mediation’ presumes a reciprocal process: the texts in this issue explore not only how listening experiences and acoustic practices are shaped by corporeality, but also attend to the many ways in which those processes work upon that body, through psychophysical affect and the representation and encoding of listening subjects in acoustic performances, technologies and cultural artefacts. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/an-ear-alone-is-not-a-being/editorial-issue-1/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;To Hear the Silence of Sound&#8217;: Making Sense of Listening in Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man</title>
		<link>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/an-ear-alone-is-not-a-being/to-hear-the-silence-of-sound?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=to-hear-the-silence-of-sound</link>
		<comments>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/an-ear-alone-is-not-a-being/to-hear-the-silence-of-sound#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>interference</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issue 1: An Ear Alone is Not a Being - Embodied Mediations in Audio Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.120.246.226/~interfer/?p=181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this essay, I examine the ways in which Ralph Ellison’s <em>Invisible Man</em> enacts listening as a corporeally distributed process, one that is not isolated in the ear, but is instead dispersed throughout the body. This essay also engages the ways in which Ellison reflects on the impact of sound technology on constructions of race. While the novel dramatizes invisibility as its key metaphor for racial dislocation, <em>Invisible Man</em> amplifies listening as a fully embodied experience, one that allows the Invisible Man space in which to reconstitute his being. For instance, about his underground home in Harlem, Invisible Man says, “There is a certain acoustical deadness in my hole, and when I have music I want to <em>feel</em> its vibration, not only with my ear but with my whole body”. He owns one phonograph on which he plays Louis Armstrong’s “(What Did I Do To Be So) Black and Blue?,” but he longs to own five phonographs so that he can envelope himself with the song’s sound. Invisible Man longs for Armstrong’s music to touch him, for audition that is felt as well as heard. In this sonic feeling, Invisible Man finds a space in which to potentially sense a newly materialized racial identity.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/an-ear-alone-is-not-a-being/to-hear-the-silence-of-sound/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sounds Like Superman? On the Representation of Bodies in Biosignal Performance</title>
		<link>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/an-ear-alone-is-not-a-being/sounds-like-superman?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sounds-like-superman</link>
		<comments>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/an-ear-alone-is-not-a-being/sounds-like-superman#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>interference</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issue 1: An Ear Alone is Not a Being - Embodied Mediations in Audio Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.120.246.226/~interfer/?p=221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This paper focuses on performance art which uses biosignals to digitally trigger or synthesise sound. A discussion of work in this field by artists Stelarc, Atau Tanaka, Pamela Z. and Mona Hatoum is followed by an account of how a critical engagement with these artists’ work is reflected in the practical approach to biosignal sonification in the author’s own performance practice. Adopting a cultural critical approach, the author suggests several ways to read the sound material in the discussed work as signifiers in a gender critical paradigm. Subsequently, drawing from accounts of the author’s own work, possibilities for a ‘queer’ practice of performance art with sonified biosignals are introduced, in which sonification methods which may be identified as adhering to normative technological paradigms, are deliberately juxtaposed with sonic references to technologies which are commonly considered inappropriate for male bodies.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/an-ear-alone-is-not-a-being/sounds-like-superman/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Musical Performance and the ‘Death Drive’</title>
		<link>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/an-ear-alone-is-not-a-being/musical-performance-and-the-death-drive?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=musical-performance-and-the-death-drive</link>
		<comments>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/an-ear-alone-is-not-a-being/musical-performance-and-the-death-drive#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>interference</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issue 1: An Ear Alone is Not a Being - Embodied Mediations in Audio Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.120.246.226/~interfer/?p=214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This paper re-evaluates the trope of music as a mode of performing subjectivity from the perspective of Slavoj Žižek’s critique of cognitivism and his discourse on the (post-Freudian) death drive. I locate performance within the gap between cognitivism’s emphasis on emotion within neurobiological reasoning, the foregrounding of empathy and sympathetic movement in embodied cognition, and deconstruction’s privileging of the text. In this light, recent developments in consciousness studies support Lacanian insights into the “object voice” and modes of listening to offer fresh insights into performance strategies in the transition from desire to drive in the performing subject. I propose a schema to ground the new models of subjectivity and embodiment in apparently diverse contemporary music, with a particular focus on works by Salvatore Sciarrino and Robert Ashley.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.interferencejournal.com/articles/an-ear-alone-is-not-a-being/musical-performance-and-the-death-drive/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
